The FDA is studying the drug to delay aging in clinical trials. The idea of ??extending the human life span is enough to immortality and others arguing that life in the mid-70s, with some comments on the controversial one...
It is good or bad medicine? Science and technology as an investor, it is a non-trivial question for me. Of our equipment is incredibly accelerated pace of technological progress and strong, this was not the important question for everyone on the planet.
Personally, I always have something that will help us all live longer and healthier've thought that a good strategy. In some cases significantly - but what I "like" consider to be different from what others are doing. In my opinion, like all of us, and my values, beliefs and life experiences and conditions and other variables are innumerable said.
I can use that code to process and make sense of the world - - is not the same as yours computer metaphor, the ideological base of the operating system to use. It's completely different, better or worse than that.
The concept of good and evil are all different, and if so, how we can decide how to work well with the technology? In this exploration, I understand that this may be the wrong starting point. With the technology to create the best technology, the best way to do well: instead, it may be the best evidence.
Technology, not only with the quality of leadership
Most of us in the world, "good" is not ambitious. We are not driven by personal values ??decided it would be better for us, depending on. However, the failure to match the quality of those groups are trying to influence, or does not happen in the best possible technology to produce the optimal approach.
For example, in large parts of Africa that model 1960-70s large aid programs, go to. Many of these programs the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, the private arm, failed in its purpose.
The best way to build better technology to work well with the technology.
An illustrative example is described in an article published last year, PlayPump, they are designed to be operated by children to play in the first round of the cheerful water pump. It appealed to the donors to finance the value of the developed world, but less than two years later, broken and abandoned pumps, maintain, Africa has been the deployment of the pump.
This is the lesson which remains as a non-profit in the world is. How can we avoid this kind of failure? My advice to traders and investors, rather than focusing on doing well with the technology, the focus is instead on building a better technology. The difference is more than semantics.
Wherever it leads to a strong curiosity, the pursuit of difficult problems, to explore, starting with the creation of better technology. It's not necessarily high-minded. Mouse or even a mousetrap in the first place the problem in a way that eliminates the need for reimagine - instead, significant level, to build a good trap is an old quest.
Good technology is not the mission of information; It is the pursuit of knowledge with the ultimate goal of any specific repairman can come from non-specialist. In both cases, the best technology to explore the creation of a law, and the understanding and ability to relentlessly push back. And the behavior and choices are usually scientists, inventors and technology share in this.
My current project, we are investing in companies with good technology, building science. In many cases, the concrete application of advanced technologies, such as the easing of the disease, to identify enough already.
But many efforts emerging science and technology, we microbiome or artificial intelligence, such as exploration, financing, the specific objectives of the difficult questions in advance about the possible use of exploration. We have until the end of this, we had to be the best in the world, in other words, we want the best technology.
Design, where values ??matter
So I asked myself: all the areas of technology and clean place to have a value? Yes, I think there is, but it is not on the high-level grand purpose. We are the product design sector.
Here is a model of thinking, and we will in the natural integration of all the work we are doing our best to do good in the world: the technology itself, which helps to better the quality of your design technology. For example, I Braintree payment companies, and the central focus of the design of the product and make the best of this technology, the company culture and transparency, while building trust and reliability.
In contrast, back PlayPump example: children's toys that are not in any way related to a clear need to raise the water distribution problems, or no remarkable impact on the availability of a scientific or technical principles. Water is pumped through play for children and adults, Bulls or electric pump that pumped water is energy intensive radical or at least not the best. PlayPump grafted on top of the price of a product in order to promote the agenda "of promoting".
Keep in profit
Fund a new generation of entrepreneurs, enterprises and organizations (and people with mental Pirates) with a variety of problems in the world are now turning their attention to individual business problems. How do we build and maintain a good technology can take advantage of the wealth of individual and collective?
Government, academia, institutions and companies from the - - in all kinds of organizations (and not) can make a good technology. Every individual successes and failures, record pros and cons, and I think the best technology, but as is often the greatest number of people to achieve the highest sustainable value creation in a capitalist market leads to intense pressure. In this system, it is left to the side of the road are poor or incomplete solution; Promising to create a better sense of market forces and competition.
Instead of the traditional establishment of an organization or charity, I decided to start an investment fund with a capital of the country is part of why this is. I work in a panel discussion this week at the Google Global altruism, and a large number of people in the hands of capitalism is that I get a good technology as a very effective way.
By their nature better define what the capitalists do not want to be in business. They want to create a profitable market. Khan Academy video tape, or even illegal for the purpose of watching, playing games, using technology to banking, they are not concerned. But only for the business results are often pluralistic and laissez-faire philosophy of moral action should be taken anyway does not mean that any different than if.
There is a strong example of this principle at work in the education sector. A laptop for every child (OLPC) low-cost computer for children in developing countries in order to obtain began in 2005. The project, ambitious and noble idea, when it is placed in all kinds of problems and ultimately failed. Meanwhile, cheap Chinese manufacturers of smart phones, the primary motivation of business, who brought about a revolution in Africa and Asia.
It is always, of course, does not work that way. Philanthropy, academia and government funding plays an important role in supporting innovation. A lot of problems, it can be a market-based solutions simply do not measure up. But really the technology that has changed the world standing on its own feet, has a strange habit.
But what about birth control pills for anti-aging? This is why it is important to meet the needs of the market in addition to the library of human knowledge. It is a good technology at its best, and push the envelope of what humanity is capable of.
With so many different models of technology I am delighted to see work towards achieving positive results. We are solving some of the most vexing challenges to make a fire, we need to communicate to a diverse ecosystem. For me, I'm a good purpose behind the technology that will create the most favorable conditions for humanity to flourish're betting.
It is good or bad medicine? Science and technology as an investor, it is a non-trivial question for me. Of our equipment is incredibly accelerated pace of technological progress and strong, this was not the important question for everyone on the planet.
Personally, I always have something that will help us all live longer and healthier've thought that a good strategy. In some cases significantly - but what I "like" consider to be different from what others are doing. In my opinion, like all of us, and my values, beliefs and life experiences and conditions and other variables are innumerable said.
I can use that code to process and make sense of the world - - is not the same as yours computer metaphor, the ideological base of the operating system to use. It's completely different, better or worse than that.
The concept of good and evil are all different, and if so, how we can decide how to work well with the technology? In this exploration, I understand that this may be the wrong starting point. With the technology to create the best technology, the best way to do well: instead, it may be the best evidence.
Technology, not only with the quality of leadership
Most of us in the world, "good" is not ambitious. We are not driven by personal values ??decided it would be better for us, depending on. However, the failure to match the quality of those groups are trying to influence, or does not happen in the best possible technology to produce the optimal approach.
For example, in large parts of Africa that model 1960-70s large aid programs, go to. Many of these programs the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, the private arm, failed in its purpose.
The best way to build better technology to work well with the technology.
An illustrative example is described in an article published last year, PlayPump, they are designed to be operated by children to play in the first round of the cheerful water pump. It appealed to the donors to finance the value of the developed world, but less than two years later, broken and abandoned pumps, maintain, Africa has been the deployment of the pump.
This is the lesson which remains as a non-profit in the world is. How can we avoid this kind of failure? My advice to traders and investors, rather than focusing on doing well with the technology, the focus is instead on building a better technology. The difference is more than semantics.
Wherever it leads to a strong curiosity, the pursuit of difficult problems, to explore, starting with the creation of better technology. It's not necessarily high-minded. Mouse or even a mousetrap in the first place the problem in a way that eliminates the need for reimagine - instead, significant level, to build a good trap is an old quest.
Good technology is not the mission of information; It is the pursuit of knowledge with the ultimate goal of any specific repairman can come from non-specialist. In both cases, the best technology to explore the creation of a law, and the understanding and ability to relentlessly push back. And the behavior and choices are usually scientists, inventors and technology share in this.
My current project, we are investing in companies with good technology, building science. In many cases, the concrete application of advanced technologies, such as the easing of the disease, to identify enough already.
But many efforts emerging science and technology, we microbiome or artificial intelligence, such as exploration, financing, the specific objectives of the difficult questions in advance about the possible use of exploration. We have until the end of this, we had to be the best in the world, in other words, we want the best technology.
Design, where values ??matter
So I asked myself: all the areas of technology and clean place to have a value? Yes, I think there is, but it is not on the high-level grand purpose. We are the product design sector.
Here is a model of thinking, and we will in the natural integration of all the work we are doing our best to do good in the world: the technology itself, which helps to better the quality of your design technology. For example, I Braintree payment companies, and the central focus of the design of the product and make the best of this technology, the company culture and transparency, while building trust and reliability.
In contrast, back PlayPump example: children's toys that are not in any way related to a clear need to raise the water distribution problems, or no remarkable impact on the availability of a scientific or technical principles. Water is pumped through play for children and adults, Bulls or electric pump that pumped water is energy intensive radical or at least not the best. PlayPump grafted on top of the price of a product in order to promote the agenda "of promoting".
Keep in profit
Fund a new generation of entrepreneurs, enterprises and organizations (and people with mental Pirates) with a variety of problems in the world are now turning their attention to individual business problems. How do we build and maintain a good technology can take advantage of the wealth of individual and collective?
Government, academia, institutions and companies from the - - in all kinds of organizations (and not) can make a good technology. Every individual successes and failures, record pros and cons, and I think the best technology, but as is often the greatest number of people to achieve the highest sustainable value creation in a capitalist market leads to intense pressure. In this system, it is left to the side of the road are poor or incomplete solution; Promising to create a better sense of market forces and competition.
Instead of the traditional establishment of an organization or charity, I decided to start an investment fund with a capital of the country is part of why this is. I work in a panel discussion this week at the Google Global altruism, and a large number of people in the hands of capitalism is that I get a good technology as a very effective way.
By their nature better define what the capitalists do not want to be in business. They want to create a profitable market. Khan Academy video tape, or even illegal for the purpose of watching, playing games, using technology to banking, they are not concerned. But only for the business results are often pluralistic and laissez-faire philosophy of moral action should be taken anyway does not mean that any different than if.
There is a strong example of this principle at work in the education sector. A laptop for every child (OLPC) low-cost computer for children in developing countries in order to obtain began in 2005. The project, ambitious and noble idea, when it is placed in all kinds of problems and ultimately failed. Meanwhile, cheap Chinese manufacturers of smart phones, the primary motivation of business, who brought about a revolution in Africa and Asia.
It is always, of course, does not work that way. Philanthropy, academia and government funding plays an important role in supporting innovation. A lot of problems, it can be a market-based solutions simply do not measure up. But really the technology that has changed the world standing on its own feet, has a strange habit.
But what about birth control pills for anti-aging? This is why it is important to meet the needs of the market in addition to the library of human knowledge. It is a good technology at its best, and push the envelope of what humanity is capable of.
With so many different models of technology I am delighted to see work towards achieving positive results. We are solving some of the most vexing challenges to make a fire, we need to communicate to a diverse ecosystem. For me, I'm a good purpose behind the technology that will create the most favorable conditions for humanity to flourish're betting.